<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wider is better?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.limeduck.com/2008/10/10/wider-is-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.limeduck.com/2008/10/10/wider-is-better/</link>
	<description>probably the worst limeduck blog ever</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geek note: brown is the new black - limeduck</title>
		<link>http://www.limeduck.com/2008/10/10/wider-is-better/#comment-2606</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek note: brown is the new black - limeduck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.limeduck.com/?p=1223#comment-2606</guid>
		<description>[...] Feeling the need for more mobility in my computing and blogging, I recently bought an Acer Aspire One, a very small notebook computer, what&#8217;s often called a &#8220;netbook&#8221; these days.  It weighs 2.2 pounds and it&#8217;s (mostly) brown.  It also runs Linux and has a solid state memory thingy instead of a hard drive, so it boots up and shuts down very very quickly.  Here it is with a Thinkpad T40.  You can compare the Thnkpad&#8217;s 14&#8243; not so wide screen (1400&#215;1050) with the Aspire&#8217;s 8.9&#8243; wide screen (1024&#215;600) and refer to my earlier rant on wideness. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Feeling the need for more mobility in my computing and blogging, I recently bought an Acer Aspire One, a very small notebook computer, what&#8217;s often called a &#8220;netbook&#8221; these days.  It weighs 2.2 pounds and it&#8217;s (mostly) brown.  It also runs Linux and has a solid state memory thingy instead of a hard drive, so it boots up and shuts down very very quickly.  Here it is with a Thinkpad T40.  You can compare the Thnkpad&#8217;s 14&#8243; not so wide screen (1400&#215;1050) with the Aspire&#8217;s 8.9&#8243; wide screen (1024&#215;600) and refer to my earlier rant on wideness. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.limeduck.com/2008/10/10/wider-is-better/#comment-2454</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.limeduck.com/?p=1223#comment-2454</guid>
		<description>Late-breaking stats from one not so random website show this distribution of screen aspect ratios reported by visitors yesterday:
1.33:1     45% (37% is 1024x768)
1.6:1      30% (20% is 1280x800)
1.25:1     21% (all is 1280x1024)
others     4% (range from super wide, probably double-monitor setups of 2.67 or 2.5:1 all the way down to some kind of mobile device at 320x396 or about 0.8:1)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late-breaking stats from one not so random website show this distribution of screen aspect ratios reported by visitors yesterday:<br />
1.33:1     45% (37% is 1024&#215;768)<br />
1.6:1      30% (20% is 1280&#215;800)<br />
1.25:1     21% (all is 1280&#215;1024)<br />
others     4% (range from super wide, probably double-monitor setups of 2.67 or 2.5:1 all the way down to some kind of mobile device at 320&#215;396 or about 0.8:1)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
